Effects of Spatial Attention on Localization of Moving Sounds
| dc.contributor.author | Esparza, Lemira V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mock, Jeffrey R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Golob, Edward J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-16T16:15:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-16T16:15:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-04-02 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Motion illusions: Representational Momentum and Lag: • Representational momentum (RM): a forward displacement (the sound traveled farther than it actually did) • Representational lag (RL): a backward displacement (the sound did not travel as far as it actually did) [Figure] RM and RL: Stimulus Duration: • Our prior experiments found RM with 2 secs durations, but RL with 1 sec durations. Attention Capture: • Greater RM for 2 sec vs 1 sec durations may be due to attention capture, which may delay/interfere with forward displacement (extrapolation). The time when attention capture is happening takes up a greater proportion of the stimulus duration (and trial time) in the 1 sec vs 2 sec stimulus. [Figure] Hypothesis: • Orienting attention to the sound’s onset location will increase RM and decrease RL. Attention: • Focused Attention: Endogenous attention: Top-down and goal-driven, can be activated with explicit instructions. Expectation: Implicitly learned patterns • Divided Attention: Exogenous attention: Bottom-up and sensory-driven, stimulus features capture attention [Figure] | |
| dc.description.department | Psychology | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Partially funded by NIH/NIGMS RISE GM60655 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/6387 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | UTSA Graduate School | |
| dc.title | Effects of Spatial Attention on Localization of Moving Sounds | |
| dc.type | Poster |