Investor Influence: Investigating the Effect of Conservative Donations on Bill Sponsorship in the U.S. Congress

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGervais, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorGarza, Stephanie
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAmberg, Stephen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWilson, Walter
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T21:11:13Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T21:11:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionThis item is available only to currently enrolled UTSA students, faculty or staff. To download, navigate to Log In in the top right-hand corner of this screen, then select Log in with my UTSA ID.
dc.description.abstractThis research investigates a key argument of asymmetrical polarization; that donations from elite political actors influnce the policymaking process. I conduct two quantitative analyses to investigate this potential relationship. The bills selected for this study are bills lobbied by Koch Industries and its subsidiaries because Koch’s influence is perhaps the most telling representation of elite political actors. Analysis 1 observes the effect of conservative donations on bills sponsored and cosponsored by Republican members of the 110th, 111th, and 112th Congresses and Analysis 2 presents the ideological quintiles of these bills based on Adam Bonica’s (2013) CFscore averages. The results of Analysis 1 indicate that most of the bills had higher Cfscore averages than the Congress and Chamber they were introduced in, however, none of the differences indicate substantive significance. Therefore, the hypothesis, Republican members of Congress, who receive more campaign contributions from conservative organizations and capitalist elites, promote bills that benefit these donors by sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation, is not supported. The results of the second analysis indicate that the upper quintiles – 0.6 and 0.8 – are ideologically conservative and the lower quintiles – 0.2 and 0.4 are ideologically liberal. Additionally, the results indicate that the Republican Party introduced the most conservative bills in the 112th Congress. The actual increase of bills introduced in the 112th Congress does not suggest that the Congress became more extreme but rather, that Republicans were able to introduce more bills after they gained control of the 112th House following the 2010 election.
dc.description.departmentPolitical Science and Geography
dc.format.extent69 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.isbn9798538140015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/3510
dc.languageen
dc.subjectPrimaries & caucuses
dc.subjectInvestigations
dc.subjectHealth care policy
dc.subjectCandidates
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectNonprofit organizations
dc.subjectPolitical parties
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectAsymmetrical Polarization
dc.subjectCongress
dc.subjectLegislation
dc.subjectPolicy
dc.subjectPolitical parties
dc.subject.classificationPolitical science
dc.titleInvestor Influence: Investigating the Effect of Conservative Donations on Bill Sponsorship in the U.S. Congress
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.dcmiText
dcterms.accessRightspq_closed
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Science and Geography
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at San Antonio
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Garza_utsa_1283M_13452.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Electronic Theses and Dissertations - UTSA Access Only