Operationalization and efficacy of mental health courts: A qualitative study

Date

2010

Authors

Ellis, Katie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This study examines how the criminal justice system ended up being a repository for persons with mental illness who commit crimes, and how mental health courts have been established over the past decade to reduce the number of persons with mental illness in the criminal justice system. A combination of treatment and court supervision is the method for reducing recidivism amongst this population. Mental health courts are new justice programs, and require process evaluations in addition to studies that focus on outcome measures such as improved psychosocial functioning and a desistance from engaging in criminal activity or violence. No known process evaluations of mental health courts were discovered. This study designed and implemented a way to examine the efficacy of mental health courts by analyzing the responses to a questionnaire, completed by various mental health court professionals across the country.

Description

This item is available only to currently enrolled UTSA students, faculty or staff. To download, navigate to Log In in the top right-hand corner of this screen, then select Log in with my UTSA ID.

Keywords

Mental Health Courts, Mentally ill offenders, process evaluation, program evaluation

Citation

Department

Criminal Justice