Thornton-Lugo, Meghan A.Rupp, Deborah E.2023-05-102023-05-102021-09-22Thornton-Lugo, M. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2021). The Communication of Justice, Injustice, and Necessary Evils: An Empirical Examination. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211040796. doi:10.1177/215824402110407962158-2440https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040796https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/1826The prevailing approach to studying justice in the workplace has focused on recipients and observers of justice. This approach, however, fails to consider the experience of other parties including those who communicate justice. To understand the experience of communicating fairness, we investigated how justice, injustice, and necessary evils differentially affect guilt and stress. In addition, we explored how communicating bad news compares to these experiences. Across two studies, we found evidence showing that guilt and stress were affected by what was being communicated, such that injustice and necessary evils provoked more guilt and stress than justice. These findings highlight how justice broadly affects communicators psychologically and physiologically.en-USAttribution 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/industrial and organizational psychologyorganizational behaviormanagementsocial sciencesorganizational communicationemotionexperimental psychologypsychologyapplied psychologyArticle