dc.contributor.author | Mosher, Sabrina | |
dc.contributor.author | Robbins, Kay A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-19T22:34:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-19T22:34:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2470-3958 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/104 | |
dc.description.abstract | Electrodermal
activity ( or galvanic skin response refers to electrical
properties of the skin that are controlled by the sympathetic nervous system
through sweat glands 1 Although EDA has long been known to be an
indicator of stress, arousal, and emotion, few systematic studies of EDA
variation across subject, task, and fatigue level have been conducted EDA
is generally thought to have two components a background tonic level that
may reflect individual characteristics and global subject state and a more
rapidly varying phasic level that measures more short term response to
environmental factors 2 In order to analyze the relationship between skin
conductance and fatigue while performing tasks, we used data from a
research study in which participants were asked to perform different tasks
on multiple days at different states of fatigue Our results suggest that the
phasic signal is highly dependent on participant’s fatigue state and the task
being performed | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Army Research Laboratory, Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF 10 2 0022 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Office of the Vice President for Research | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | The UTSA Journal of Undergraduate Research and Scholarly Work;Volume 3 | |
dc.title | Skin Conductance as a Measure of Fatigue in Different Tasks | en_US |
dc.type | Poster | en_US |