Cross-age peer mentoring: Model review

dc.contributor.authorKarcher, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Joshua R.M.
dc.description.abstractThis review addresses four topics related to one-on-one cross-age peer mentoring for children and adolescents, including: 1. Its documented effectiveness for mentees and mentors, 2. The extent to which effectiveness depends on characteristics of mentors, mentees, or program practices, 3. Intervening processes likely to link cross-age peer mentoring to youth outcomes, and 4. The success of efforts to reach and engage targeted youth and achieve high quality implementation. Extending a 2007 MENTOR Research in Action monograph definition of cross-age peer mentoring, which also was used in other literature reviews on cross-age peer mentoring, this review sharply differentiates cross-age one-to-one peer mentoring programs from cross-age peer group mentoring, peer-led education or targeted preventative interventions, and peer mentoring as an informal practice within larger programs. Overall, evidence is beginning to accumulate that supports at least the short-term effectiveness of formal cross-age peer mentoring programs. But this literature is growing at a very slow pace, mainly, it seems, because most of the literature on “peer mentoring,” old and new, combines one-to-one cross-age peer mentoring with group peer mentoring programs and peer education led by older youth. The limited evidence of effectiveness of cross-age peer mentoring, specifically as defined in this review, reveals benefits accrued by both children (mentees) and their teenage mentors. However, benefits to mentors are not the focus of this review. The strongest effects for mentees appear to be increases in school attitudes (e.g., connectedness), relationships with adults (both teachers and parents) and peers, and improvements in internal affective states (e.g., self-esteem). The most significant moderators of program effectiveness appear to be the mentors’ attitudes and motivations, and the degree of clear programmatic infrastructure and fidelity of its implementation. Involvement of parents in programs also seems to yield larger benefits, and securing support from school administrators and teachers can directly influence effectiveness. The means by which programs have positive effects on mentees appears to be largely through the consistent and affirming presence of mentors, and the clarity and predictability resulting from a clear program structure. These assist mentors in establishing what Rhodes4 describes as the building blocks of successful mentoring relationships—empathy, trust, mutuality—despite variability in the maturity and social distractibility of the teenage mentors.en_US
dc.description.departmentEducational Psychologyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by Grant 2013-JU-FX-K001 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justiceen_US
dc.identifier.citationKarcher, M. J., & Berger, J. (2017). Cross-age peer mentoring: Model review. National Mentoring Resource Center, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice. National Mentoring Resource Center.
dc.publisherNational Mentoring Resource Center, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justiceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNational Mentoring Resource Center Model Review;
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.titleCross-age peer mentoring: Model reviewen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Karcher Berger 2017 One-to-One_Cross-Age_Peer_Michael Karcher.pdf
999.83 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.86 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission