Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g
| dc.contributor.author | Coyle, Thomas R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-19T14:55:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-19T14:55:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-03-11 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-04-19T14:55:39Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | This comment argues that an important issue in intelligence research is to identify constructs with validity beyond g, and that non-g residuals of tests represent a promising target. | |
| dc.description.department | Psychology | |
| dc.identifier | doi: 10.3390/jintelligence2010021 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Intelligence 2 (1): 21-25 (2014) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/334 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 United States | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | general intelligence (g) | |
| dc.subject | non-g residuals | |
| dc.subject | SAT | |
| dc.subject | ACT | |
| dc.title | Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g | |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |