Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments
| dc.contributor.author | Shahrokh Hamedani, Abtin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bazilio, Arianne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Soleimanifar, Hanieh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shipley, Heather | |
| dc.contributor.author | Giacomoni, Marcio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T14:33:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T14:33:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-27 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-05-13T14:33:03Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Low impact development (LID) practices, such as bioretention and sand filter basins, are stormwater control measures designed to mitigate the adverse impacts of urbanization on stormwater. LID treatment performance is highly dependent on the media characteristics. The literature suggests that bioretention media often leach nutrients in the stormwater effluent. The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment performance of different sand and bioretention soil mixtures. Specifically, this investigation aimed to answer whether the use of limestone and recycled glass could improve the treatment performance of bioretention systems. Column experiments were designed to assess (1) the removal efficiencies of different sand and bioretention soil mixtures and (2) the impact of plant uptake on removal rates. Enhanced pollutant removal was observed for the custom blends with addition of limestone sand, indicating mean dissolved and total phosphorus removal of 44.5% and 32.6% respectively, while the conventional bioretention soil mixtures leached phosphorus. Moreover, improved treatment of dissolved and total copper was achieved with mean removal rates of 70.7% and 93.4%, respectively. The results suggest that the nutrient effluent concentration decreased with the addition of plants, with mean phosphorus removal of 72.4%, and mean nitrogen removal of 22% for the limestone blend. | |
| dc.description.department | Civil and Environmental Engineering | |
| dc.identifier | doi: 10.3390/w13091210 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Water 13 (9): 1210 (2021) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12588/593 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 United States | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | stormwater control measure | |
| dc.subject | bioretention | |
| dc.subject | limestone sand | |
| dc.subject | pollutant removal | |
| dc.subject | nutrients | |
| dc.subject | stormwater quality | |
| dc.subject | column experiment | |
| dc.subject | pilot study | |
| dc.title | Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments | |
| dc.type | Article |